Aubrey de Grey says you could live to be 500. What do you think?

30/05/2010 - 2 Responses

The man who will end aging?

Some of you may be wondering, who is Aubrey de Grey?

If you haven’t googled the name already, let me summarize. He is a a biomedical gerontologist with a Ph.D. from Cambridge who has come up with a plan to not only reverse aging, but end the process altogether. Does this sound crazy? Well, the scientific community has mixed reviews. Many reputable scientists call him crazy, but there has been no conclusive evidence to prove him wrong either.

Aubrey de Grey says children born today can live to be 500 years old…or older.

He has 7 main theories on how to end aging, which are as follows (Quoted from GQ article by Michael Finkel):

“1. Chromosomes Mutate. Some of these mutations result in tumor-forming cells. The fix: Use gene therapy to prevent cells from generating the enzyme telomerase, which should stem the growth of cancer cells.

2. Mitochondria also mutate. These tiny cellular power plants contain small strands of DNA that are vulnerable to attack by unstable molecules known as free radicals. Over time, this oxidative stress may trigger age-related issues. The fix: Using gene therapy, transfer a backup copy of mitochondrial DNA to the safe house of the nucleus.

3. Cells become clogged. One culprit is a fatty residue called lipofuscin, which clogs cells in the heart. The fix: genetically modify waste-eating enzymes that exist in the soil of graveyards, where they break down human remains, then deliver them to our bodies to break down the junk.

4. Extracellular clogging. As we age, the fluid around our cells becomes crowded with amyloid plaque, which our bodies can’t breakdown. This build up has been associated with Alzheimer’s. The fix: A vaccination that will provoke our immune cells to digest plaque.

5. We get stiff. Molecules that give our body structure bind with other molecules, leading to the hardening of tissues. The fix: Create bond-breaking drugs that will not harm any other molecules.

6. Cells don’t die. Renegade cells disrupt normal cellular processes, likely leading to diabetes and other ailments. The fix: Insert “suicide genes” into our bodies, which will target and destroy unwanted cells. Also, vaccinations.

7. Cells die. Nondividing cells found in the heart and the brain are not replaced when they die. The fix: use periodic stem-cell transfusions that regrow lost cells. “

What do you think? Please leave any comments that come to mind, and for more information, there is the link below, or check out this month’s GQ article on him, in  which he lays out his plans for a future without aging.

http://www.firstscience.com/home/articles/humans/aubrey-de-grey-wants-to-wish-you-a-happy-200th-birthday_42775.html

The Pledge Of Allegiance

03/02/2010 - 2 Responses

So, I may be a little late to this fact, but I recently found out that the Pledge of Allegiance has actually been modified five times since it’s creation, and only added the words “under God”  pretty recently, in 1954. Any thoughts to why this change was made nearly half a century after the original pledge was written? What do you think this revision symbolizes? Please contribute any thoughts or questions you have on the matter!

Tiller, Roeder and Abortion Debates

01/02/2010 - One Response

If you have been watching the news this week, you have probably seen that the trial for Scott Roeder has just come to a verdict, with Roeder being found guilty for Dr. George Tiller’s murder. Roeder is an anti-abortion (or Pro-Life) activist, and Tiller was one of the only doctors left in the country that performed late-term abortions. The full background on this case can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_George_Tiller . What do you think about the verdict of this trial? What do you think about Dr. Tiller’s practice of late-term abortions? Do you think what Roeder did was “domestic terrorism” (a media headline of this case suggested this). Please contribute your thoughts and opinions on this case, and ask any questions about it here as well.

Education, Cross-Culturally

27/01/2010 - 2 Responses

In my Comparative Families class this morning, we were discussing education cross culturally, and my professor mentioned that the percentage of Americans with at least a  Bachelor’s Degree were far less than many Scandinavian countries, at 27.2%. This seemed shocking to many people in the class, and had me wondering about public funding and education. Here are some questions I thought of:

Does free education equal more educated? Why is it that the U.S. can not pay for its citizens University education? Why are other countries (especially Scandinavian countries) able to provide free University education? Do you think that in countries where education is publically funded, there are more educated and politically conscious citizens?

Please contribute any thoughts, questions and opinions you have!

Thanks,

Karen

Discussion and Learning through Others

26/01/2010 - One Response

Hey!

I started this blog to stimulate conversation and bring up topics that I have encountered in class or in life that are interesting to me and warrant more discussion. Since Facebook is not the ideal place for academic discussion and the advancement of knowledge, I created this space for friends, other students and just people in general to discuss issues and concepts that come up in daily, academic life. Please email me if you have a topic you want to discuss, so I can post it on here. My email is heykmarie@gmail.com. Please contribute your facts, thoughts, opinions and questions.

Thanks!

Karen

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.